Last week, I was invited to speak to young adult Friends at my local meeting. I didn’t have so much a typical presentation as lots of question about what it means to be a young Friend today.
As one who might not even be included in this group, I actually felt there would be a cultural divide based on something as small as ten-year age difference as well as the modern culture that had developed during that gap in time. For example, I grew up without the Internet completely, while those 10 years younger would basically have been incorporating it into their lives almost seemlessly.
I was interested in several questions and topics:
- Modern Quakers and Quakerism–what does it look like, where does it come from, post-modernism and the progressive Quakers, technology’s affect on Quakers, modern day eldering, remixing the Testimonies for today
- “Let your life speak”–evangelism, progressive missionaries, and speaking truth to power
- Beyond “spirituality”–essential religious literacy, a Christ-centered life, Quakers and the Bible, life in spiritual community, connections with other Anabaptist movements
- Touching the elephant–strands of Quakerism, Bible stories among Friends, our relationship to the Divine
- Inclusivity–radical inclusiveness, “diversity” among Friends, Friends we disagree with, Quaker history and its inner-contradictions, modern “face” of Quakerism
- What do young Friends want from Quakerism? What does Quakerism ask from us?
- How does evangelism and Quakerism work in today’s world?
- What does leadership look like in a non-hierarchical organization?
- Have you made peace with Quakerism’s roots in the Bible? How or not?
- How does technology and Quakerism combine? What is “plain” in today’s terms?
- What is membership? What does it mean to live in a spiritual community?
- 22-44 years old, “not an old Friend”
- not married, no children
- capable of eldering
- “convinced” or seeking, but asking for more Quaker education
- have shared generational-experiences
- an “experienced” community, including that of the Internet as well as in-person
- a desire to escape from the modern world into a world of “real” values
- valuing the contrarian
- the activation of the will to move toward action rather than simple passive resistance
- the desire to be “busted open” by our faith again and again
He noted that pluses of Quaker faith to new seekers might include that people love the unanswered questions of faith, the massive documentation of Quaker faith, and the desire of taking something, building on it, and sharing it with others. Notably, Wess comes from the evangelical Quaker faith, rather than the unprogrammed background of our Meeting, but he accentuated the movement of Quaker faith toward the emerging convergent Friends movement.
Overall, the meeting seemed to be enlivened by the dissection and exploration of what faith means to the modern seeker. It was a lot of ground to cover in only 2 hours, but seemingly felt to be a time which Quakerism could be explored at many levels.
[...] that discuss religion’s role in a post-modern world, which you can find here, and here, and here. These posts were very interesting to me, but they left me with one lingering [...]
Take a look at “weak theology” in this link, Allison:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodern_Christianity
Post-modernism itself isn’t easy to grasp, as it has so many variations and applications, but it works on the concept of deconstructionism (a la “this is not a pipe”, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Magritte). Or, maybe in the modern sense of the word “fact” would mean “absolute” (“facts are simple and facts are straight”) where a post-modernist would say facts are determined by the decentralized interpretation.
I’m a fan of the Talking Heads who put it this way:
Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don’t do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don’t stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape
(from “Crosseyed and Painless”)
In the case of religion, interpretation (in this case, faith) and action (in this case, practice) takes precedence over the authority and emphasis on belief. Hence it’s application to Quakerism in the modern world where faith and practice create a basis for a post-modern Quaker.
I’m completely oversimplifying here, for the sake of brevity, and am in no way truly versed in philosophy, but am summarizing and smashing atoms together here to try and capture the point.
Thanks for posting this Chad – as you know I thought it was a lot fun being a part of that conversation and I too found it to be lively and interesting. You’re summary is great too – thanks.
I think postmodernism is a way that I’ve been living for a long time. It’s nice that theorists have come up with a word for it!